Principles of CST for Spirit of Brotherhood - myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Write about thePrinciples of CST for Spirit of Brotherhood and Justice. Answer: Overview Catholic Social Thought (CST) is a doctrine that postulates that we (people) are conjointly dependent as well as interrelated to one another (Finn, 2010). It shows that the CST supports the point that each individual is created in the likeness of their creator. However, CST mainly focuses on the assumption that God had a good plan for every one of us to establish the spirit of brotherhood, justice and peace across the globe. Its therefore understood that he (God) is part of our living. This is not only limited to the church doctrines or practices but it is also compromised on the means through which we live in the society. The rationale of this article is to describe the nine principles of CST and explain how the concept of self, as well as community are interconnected. The principles of Catholic Social Thought The principle of CST is a reflection of the work done by people to facilitate the whole world on matters of dignity as well as common goodness in the society (Cornuel et al., 2010). It has been observed that CST is categorised into nine key facets which will be discussed below. The principles are somehow similar to one another and related to Catholicism. However, they enhance a common person with a view of catholic concepts as well as show the link amongst individualism and community. Common good plus community Irrespective of the evolution of new culture of fierce egoism, this principle holds that human beings are social as well as sanctified (Himes, 2005). Besides, it has been observed that both social structure plus potentials are influenced by both economic and political models. However, the power as well as self-respect of people for developing in the society should be warranted by sharing common goal and development of the religious as well as the successive goods that are the rights of the people in the society. Human person Dignity According to (Hornsby-Smith, 2006), this principle shows the aspect of being pleased, appreciated as well as valued for the physical and emotional authenticity plus empowerment. It was the cornerstone of realisation of a moral community plus subjected to the birth of each person for putting the law values. Ideally, the self respect of a human person needs no restraining since it could lower humanity (Hornsby-Smith, 2006). Universal purpose of goods This principle is that it shows a person/s right on accessing goods as well as materials with a common objective of continued existence. However, goods and rights related to one another are given only for the development of humankind and meet the standard of the framework as Kammer (2004) holds. Subsidiarity The policy of Subsidiarity bridges a gap between the affected societies plus the policy makers. It is perceived to be significant when it comes to resolving uncontrollable problems at the local set up in the community with the aim of making immediate decisions for all (Massaro, 2005). Promotion of peace. For peace to prevail this principle comprises of three key components which include individual commitment, justice plus the human self respect for a common goodness. So, every time these facets are being compromised, peace is promoted. Stewardship of creation This is the understanding of human kind for the independence as well as emanating on earth as well as shows the duty of a person. The principle entails the role of a person to develop the surrounding environment. According to stewardship of creation, we (humans) are perceived as caretakers and not proprietors of the environment of creation (Santos Laczniak, 2009). Participation The principle of participation is derived out of the subsidiaries that prioritise our human rights as well as the problems that lead to the political, cultural as well as socioeconomic environments in which we survive. Global participation According to Scheid (2007), this principle shows a persons liability towards one another without taking into consideration the restriction of nationality, race, origin or any other aspect. It makes use of thoughts of being accountable for the most significant person of one good. The preferential choice for the poor. The principle deals with the roles plus duties of charity to the CSTs thus providing an option for dealing with the hindrances for persons living in poverty (Solari, 2007). However, it is of high paramount to develop the growth of those poor in the community society since it equates to serving a larger society. How the Concept of Self and Community are interconnected? The interconnection between self and society is discussed in the CST facets with a aspect that the connection is common for all the places across the globe. For instance, Ubuntu is an Africa, Bantu term meaning humanity and it includes a brief of being in the same society as the word illustrates itself for a person as Im what Im due to who we all are. Its meaning is direct to answer the reasons to be in society for equal as well as collaborative culture (Stabilise, 2015). Sociality and human being The common practice of dignity of the human person as well as prosperous makes the connection between community and individual very strong. Humans are social beings and are alarmed by individualism to the extent of being distinct from the society. However, the aspect of a person to be included in the society is a concept that we all aspire for. Henceforth, people would not be treated with dignity plus prosperous if the community is not protected as well as transparent for such (Van Uitert, 2007). Both individualism and society are therefore in existence with support for one other. Prosperous Prosperity defines the completeness of a persons social, emotional, spiritual and psychological needs of the society. Our relationships with families and friends, employment to hold expenditure plus chances of development are other areas of flourishing. In simple terms, prosperity is a characteristic of life for a person since it the intermediary between deficiency, plus sufficiency in goods (Solari, 2007). However, individual-balance of things as per the activities as well as behaviour in life is perceived as a characteristic. Prosperity can also mean being fair as well as satisfy restraint plus being curious for the existence of life. A persons temporary joy is not like prosperous behaviour since it implies to being noble plus satisfies with self-activities. However, the flourishing self is somehow enhances in flourishing a whole society since it comprises of the contributions by individuals. Catholic Social Thoughts in Relationship and Conclusion The nine principles discussed above indirectly enforce a person to be in the society for self plus others. The prosperity of the whole human society is an essential part of relationships. However, the frameworks focus on a moral perspective to accomplish the needs of each person in the society to survive as well as develop easily together with a presentation of oneness in the society (Finn, 2010). Also, individual participation plays an integral role for unified behaviour as well as the structure of the community. The catholic social thoughts solution defines the basic to move on society with the same measure of care plus the wellbeing of an individual. However, without honest plus good integration of self into the society, its not established trustworthy, meaningful as well a collaborative society for service to human dignity as well as flourishing. All in all, both the self and community are independent on one another. References Cornuel, E., Habisch, A., Kletz, P. (2010). The practical wisdom of the Catholic social teachings. Journal of Management Development, 29(7/8), 747-754. Finn, D. (Ed.). (2010). The true wealth of nations: Catholic social thought and economic life. Oxford University Press. Himes, K. R. (Ed.). (2005). Modern Catholic social teaching: Commentaries and interpretations. Georgetown University Press. Hornsby-Smith, M. P. (2006). An introduction to Catholic social thought. Cambridge University Press. Kammer, F. (2004). Doing faithjustice: An introduction to Catholic social thought. Paulist Press. Massaro, T. (2015). Living justice: Catholic social teaching in action. Rowman Littlefield. Santos, N. J., Laczniak, G. R. (2009). Just markets from the perspective of Catholic social teaching. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 29-38. Scheid, A. F. (2017). Catholic Social Thought. Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America, 72. Solari, S. (2007). The contribution of neo-thomistic thought to Roman Catholicsocial economy. American Review of Political Economy, 5(2), 39-58. Stabile, S. J. (2015). The Contributions of Catholic Social Thought to the Effort to Secure Just Wages for Workers. Journal of Catholic Social Thought, 12(1), 45-72. Van Uitert, R. (2007). Undocumented Immigrants in the United States: A Discussion of Catholic Social Thought and Mormon Social Thought Principles. J. Cath. Leg. Stud., 46, 277.